What industry adaptation cannot do
A sector story cannot convert a development tool into clinical care, surveillance, candidate screening, or high-impact automation.
Industries
The same standard, adapted to the setting
How USLC is used in organisations, education and training, and coaching practices—without turning development tools into surveillance or selection.
Three settings, not a sector catalogue
Older industry pages listed technology, finance, healthcare, education, and the public sector as if each needed hiring insights or clinical wellbeing claims. We are not rebuilding that map.
The useful split is the setting you work in: an organisation with employees, a learning environment, or a practitioner practice. Those three change consent, safeguarding, and who administers access.
Where USLC is configured
Organisations
Leadership, team learning, and voluntary employee development—not candidate selection.
Education and Training
Reflection and communication practice with consent, safeguarding, and instructor oversight.
Coaches and Consultants
Client journeys and workshops that leave professional judgement with the practitioner.
Industry questions
Do you have a healthcare or finance page?
Not as a hiring or clinical offer. If you work in those sectors, start from Organisations or Education and keep the same limits.
Can the same system be used in all three settings?
Often yes, with different consent, access, and facilitation. FOQUS360 in a school is not the same implementation as FOQUS360 in a company.
Who owns the data in each setting?
That must be written down before launch. The Trust Center explains the questions; contracts confirm the answers.
Where do I start if I am buying for a company?
Read Organisations, then Leadership or Team Development, then contact sales.
Pick the setting you actually work in
If you are still unsure, send a short description of the participants and the goal.